debian-legal Aug 2003 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 3

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Jérôme Marant

My understanding of the GFDL issue Aug 30

Jérôme Marant

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 25
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 24
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 25
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27

Claus Färber

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 28
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 24
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 03
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 08

Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 01
Re: mozilla export restrictions Aug 07
Re: perl modules' default licence Aug 02
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

A Mennucc1

please check mplayer 0.90-3 Aug 01

Abigail

Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included Aug 15

Adam Warner

Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 19
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Re: Decision GFDL Aug 28
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: mplayer licenses Aug 07
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 10
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Sep 01
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: Is the Apache Software License DFSG-compliant? Aug 08
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 27

Adrien de Sentenac

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 23

Aigars Mahinovs

Legal status of software licences Aug 25
Re: Legal status of software licences Aug 25

Andreas Barth

Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
gif-creating applications? Aug 08
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 28
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 29
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 25

Andreas Metzler

Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 22
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 22

andrew

Re: semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO? Aug 08

Andrew Pollock

Advice on DFSG status of this licence Aug 20

Andrew Smith

unsubscribe Aug 14

Andrew Suffield

Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 26
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence Aug 22
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 28
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
Re: A way of looking at Software, Documentation, and Data Aug 13
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 06
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 19
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22
Re: ircd-hybrid and OpenSSL Aug 18
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 07
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 06
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: Legal status of software licences Aug 25
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 24
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem (joke) Aug 14
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 28
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 23
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 15
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 25
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 30
Re: gif-creating applications? Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 30
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: Legal status of software licences Aug 25
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 06
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 04
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 28
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 10
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 11
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 28

Anthony DeRobertis

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: A way of looking at Software, Documentation, and Data Aug 12
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 07
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 07
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: documentation eq software ? Sep 01
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem (joke) Aug 14
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 14
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 10
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 17
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 08
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Aug 19
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 10
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 17
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: documentation eq software ? Sep 01
Worries about GPLv3 (was Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy) Aug 24
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 15
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 10
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Aug 17
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 07
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 09
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 17
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem) Aug 19
Re: The GPL and you Sep 01
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 10
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: license for newbiedoc Aug 19
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24

Anthony Towns

Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 26
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 26
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 28
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 25

ANTIGEN_MBSOPPRAPP02

MBSOPPRAPP02 found FILE FILTER= *.pif file Aug 21
MBSOPPRAPP02 found VIRUS= I-Worm.Sobig.f.txt (Kaspersky) virus Aug 21

Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet

Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 26
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 26
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 27
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 23
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24

Barak Pearlmutter

Re: mozilla export restrictions Aug 07
Re: Legal status of software licences Aug 25

Bas Zoetekouw

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Bdale Garbee

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Bernhard R. Link

Re: How to get around the GFDL (under UK law, at least) Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27

Bob Hilliard

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Branden Robinson

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 30
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 04
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
[DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
[STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 11
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 24
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
[RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Sep 01
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: Licence oddity in Securing Debian Manual (was: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL) Aug 30
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 26
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
[HUMOR] Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 26
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 24
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
[DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 21
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 04
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 26
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: DFSG intent question Aug 12
Re: Licence oddity in Securing Debian Manual (was: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL) Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 02
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 04
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 26
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
PROCLAMATION REGARDING SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION Aug 11
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
[DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: license clarification for IRRToolSet Aug 26
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 05
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 04
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 31
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Aug 19
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux] Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 26
Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25

Brian Kimball

Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07

Brian M. Carlson

Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME Aug 22
Re: gif-creating applications? Aug 15
Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22

Brian Nelson

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 01

Brian T. Sniffen

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 26
GFDL (Was Re: documentation eq software ?) Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 08
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Licence oddity in Securing Debian Manual Aug 28
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence Aug 20
Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287) Aug 01
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 01
Re: Can the FSF be corrupted Aug 30
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 04
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 30
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 01
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 05
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 23
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 09
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Can the FSF be corrupted Aug 30
Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287) Aug 29

Bruce Perens

Re: DFSG intent question Aug 11

Carl Witty

a lurker's thoughts on "software" Aug 14

Chris Cheney

[mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux] Aug 28

Chris Lawrence

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22

christophe barbe

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Craig Sanders

RE: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28

D . Goel

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 27

Daniel Isacc Walker

Re: The GPL and you Aug 31
Re: The GPL and you Aug 31
The GPL and you Aug 31

David B Harris

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 01
Re: GNU FDL makes 'difference files' useless Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: How to get around the GFDL (under UK law, at least) Aug 28
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: GNU FDL makes "difference files" useless Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28

David Schleef

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)? Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22

David Starner

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25

Debian Bug Tracking System

Bug#181493: marked as done (glibc: Sun RPC code is non-free) Aug 23
Bug#181493: Info received (was Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free) Aug 26

Dmitry Borodaenko

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26

Don Armstrong

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 23
Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 21
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 21
Re: OT: Documentation as a Program [Re: Inconsistencies in our approach] Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22
OT: Documentation as a Program [Re: Inconsistencies in our approach] Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sep 01
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 28
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 26

The last update was on 06:02 GMT Tue May 28. There are 1420 messages. Page 1 of 3.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 3

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc