On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 09:19:01AM -0000, MJ Ray wrote: > Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be> wrote: > > [...] Having a > > clear policy about documentation would most certainly stop that > > discussion. > > This suggests to me that finishing the debian doc policy is an appropriate > fix, yet you seemed to reject it elsewhere. Wouter has a solution in search of a problem. He wants a GR that will "define" software and documentation, probably in the Social Contract. It seems he will settle for nothing less. I continue to wonder why we should bother. Passing such a GR just to shut up people who can't be troubled to think for five minutes within the context of debian-legal's role within the project doesn't seem to be a sufficiently good reason (to me) for exercising the weighty GR process. -- G. Branden Robinson | One man's theology is another man's Debian GNU/Linux | belly laugh. branden@debian.org | -- Robert Heinlein http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpENoo9TDfls.pgp
Description: PGP signature