[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem



On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 12:47:40AM +0200, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:
> >http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00126.html
> 
> If it was decided, why DFSG and SC were not changed?

The DFSG and SC were not changed because there were and are pending
Constitutional questions to be resolved first.

That, at least, is the opinion of the previous and current Project
Secretaries.

My understanding of clause 4.1.5 of the Consitution is that we can amend
either of those documents with a standard General Resolution.

You should catch up on the past 3 years' worth of the archives of
the debian-vote mailing list as well.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |          Measure with micrometer,
Debian GNU/Linux                   |          mark with chalk,
branden@debian.org                 |          cut with axe,
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |          hope like hell.

Attachment: pgpMgbJUTxZ24.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: