Worries about GPLv3 (was Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy)

[Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>]

On Sunday, Aug 24, 2003, at 10:10 US/Eastern, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> One thing we are sure about, is that, according to RMS, FSF is aware
> of the GPL compatibility problem and is going to work this out, as soon
> as it gets enough manpower.

Considering how much they seem to want to keep, e.g., invariant 
sections, this worries me.

Adding a "you may use this under the terms of the GPL, either version 
two or later..." takes next to no manpower; rewriting the GPL to *add* 
invariant sections takes a lot.

Hmmm...