Re: APSL 2.0
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 03:10, Brian T. Sniffen wrote:
...
> I think this era isn't very different from that of 15 years ago. RMS,
> and the FSF, are spooked by the success of web service providers.
> They didn't seem very upset by modems, remote terminals, and
> timesharing systems, though. I think they're just experiencing
> culture shock, and are overreacting to something which really isn't an
> important change.
>
> Worse, they're adding a sufficient encumbrance to networking computer
> systems to lock code available only under an APSL/Affero style license
> out of networked environments. If they succeed in promulgating these
> ideas, they'll hinder growth of networked systems. Perhaps a good way
> of summing up the problem is this:
>
> They're discriminating against a field of endeavor. Now, it's Free to
> discriminate against a business model, such as "A monopoly on software
> in boxes on shelves." It's not Free to discriminate against a use
> model, such as "running nuclear power plants." This is discrimination
> against both a business model (web services providers) and a use model
> (providing access to computers over a network).
This is a brilliant summary. If your compelling reasoning is correct
you're not only placed the issue into the context of the DFSG but done
so in a straightforward way within one paragraph.
Wow!
Regards,
Adam
Reply to:
- References:
- APSL 2.0
- From: Jens Schmalzing <jens.schmalzing@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
- Re: APSL 2.0
- From: Adam Warner <lists@consulting.net.nz>
- Re: APSL 2.0
- From: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@free-expression.org>
- Re: APSL 2.0
- From: Adam Warner <lists@consulting.net.nz>
- Re: APSL 2.0
- From: Matthew Palmer <mpalmer@debian.org>
- Re: APSL 2.0
- From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)