[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise



On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:44:57AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> Ya know, I was always sure that "or (at your option) any later version"
> header people blindly add to their source would turn out to be a Bad
> Thing.
> 
> Imagine... GPLv3 with Invariant Sections... Microsoft take Linux and add
> a bunch of code to it, maybe something really handy like the ability to
> run Win32 apps natively.

Won't happen with "Linux" -- please review the license applied to the
Linux kernel.  It's missing a certain phrase.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    If a man ate a pound of pasta and a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    pound of antipasto, would they
branden@debian.org                 |    cancel out, leaving him still
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    hungry?              -- Scott Adams

Attachment: pgpZJoMHfVVWo.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: