[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:14:31AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> I suggest that even if the GFDL did not allow modification of the invariant
> sections, if it at least allowed removal of them, we would be in much better
> shape.  It would, for instance, allow people to better take the manual from
> program A and adapt it for program B, even if they disagreed with the GNU
> Manifesto or used a different license for program B.

Oh yeah, I forgot to mention:

RMS has repeatedly and explicitly rejected such an alteration of the GNU
FDL's terms.  Please review his mails to this list over the past 2

G. Branden Robinson                |    If you make people think they're
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    thinking, they'll love you; but if
branden@debian.org                 |    you really make them think, they'll
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    hate you.

Attachment: pgpssSU9L0KDn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: