debian-legal Aug 2003 by author

[previous page]

Page 2 of 3

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Don Armstrong

Re: Debian logo DFSG-freeness Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 20
Re: Debian logo DFSG-freeness Aug 28

Doug Winter

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Dylan Thurston

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 04
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 25
termcap status? Aug 30
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 09

Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS

Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
a minimal copyleft Aug 03
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: The GPL and you Aug 31
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
EBCDIC (WAS: Re: a minimal copyleft) Aug 08
Re: perl modules' default licence Aug 03
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 26

Eduard Bloch

Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24

Fedor Zuev

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 31
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
RE: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 12
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 09
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
GNU FDL makes "difference files" useless Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 13
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 23

fedor_zuev

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28

Felix E. Klee

Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Aug 18
Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME Aug 22
FFII-online-protest against patents Aug 16
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Aug 18

firewall-admins

Mailscanner warning notification! (Attachment Removal) Aug 27

Florian Weimer

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME Aug 22
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: mozilla export restrictions Aug 07

Francesco Paolo Lovergine

Moving from BSD original to GPL Aug 19

Francesco Potorti`

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28

gabucino

Re: mplayer licenses Aug 07
Re: mplayer licenses Aug 06
Re: mplayer licenses Aug 07

Gerfried Fuchs

swirl infringement by electrostore.se Aug 27
Re: swirl infringement by electrostore.se Aug 29
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 28

Giacomo A. Catenazzi

Re: Legal status of software licences Aug 25
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Glenn Maynard

Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Aug 18
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 04

Henning Makholm

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 01
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 08
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 04
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08

Henrion Benjamin

Demonstrations against Software Patents in Brussels, 27aug: Debian help? Aug 24

iain d broadfoot

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

InterScan Notification ZRH-S216

The virus SOBIG.F has been found in your message. Aug 28
Virus SOBIG.F found and deleted Aug 28

Jacobo Tarrio

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 04

Jakob Bohm

Re: perl modules' default licence Aug 03
Re: perl modules' default licence Aug 03
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 03
Re: MBSOPPRAPP02 found VIRUS= I-Worm.Sobig.f.txt (Kaspersky) virus Aug 31
Re: msession copyright Aug 02
Re: perl modules' default licence Aug 23
Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 31
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24

Jamin W. Collins

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22

Jane Morgan

Virus Found in message "That movie" Aug 25
Virus Found in message "Approved" Aug 22

Jeff Bailey

Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 22

Jens Schmalzing

APSL 2.0 Aug 07

Jeremy Hankins

Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 12
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 28
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Then let's hear your proposal Aug 15
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 12
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 29
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 28
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Aug 18
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29

Jeremy Malcolm

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 27

Jimmy Kaplowitz

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16

Joe Buck

Re: Re: Decision GFDL Aug 27

Joe Drew

Re: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 23
Re: libdvdcss Aug 12
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 25
Re: Bug#181493: Is the Sun RPC License DFSG-free? Aug 25
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Aug 18

Joe Moore

Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 06
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 15
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 05
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 06
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: GNU FDL makes 'difference files' useless Aug 28
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 27
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 04
Re: Licence oddity in Securing Debian Manual (was: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL) Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 06
A way of looking at Software, Documentation, and Data Aug 12
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 05
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: How to get around the GFDL (under UK law, at least) Aug 28
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 04
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25

Joe Wreschnig

Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 05
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 02
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Worries about GPLv3 (was Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy) Aug 24
Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach] Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 05
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 05
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 03
Re: in-depth information about how piman views publications vs. software vs. documentation Aug 28
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 02
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 24
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 05
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach] Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 03
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 12
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 01
Re: GNU FDL makes "difference files" useless Aug 28
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 25

Joel Baker

Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence Aug 20
Re: Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Aug 18
Bug#68256: License problems with TinyMUSH Aug 17
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27

Joerg Wendland

Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: msession copyright Aug 03
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
license clarification for IRRToolSet Aug 26
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: license clarification for IRRToolSet Aug 27
msession copyright Aug 02

Joey Hess

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 05
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

John Galt

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15

John Goerzen

Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 23
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 01
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08

John H. Robinson, IV

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 02
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 03

Jonerik Sjölander

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Jordi Mallach

Re: Demonstrations against Software Patents in Brussels, 27aug: Debian help? Aug 27

jorgland

Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22

Joshua Kwan

ircd-hybrid and OpenSSL Aug 18

Josselin Mouette

Re: mplayer licenses Aug 07
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence Aug 20
Re: Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)? Aug 31
(completely OFF-TOPIC) Aug 31
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Debian logo DFSG-freeness Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: [STATUS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 31
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: mplayer licenses Aug 07

Kai Henningsen

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 09

Katrina

Take a Fantasy Cruise with Me! Aug 04

Keith Dunwoody

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 13
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: OT: TV signals [Was: Inconsistencies in our approach] Aug 13

Keith Stephen Dunwoody

Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 04

Kevin Rosenberg

Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31

Kyle McMartin

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Lynn Winebarger

Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 04
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 08

M. Drew Streib

Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Manoj Srivastava

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 12
Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 22
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 18
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 01
Software Freedoms : documentation Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 12
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 23
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20
Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 21
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 02
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 14
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 12
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 21

Marcelo E. Magallon

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22

Mark Jason Dominus

Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included Aug 14

Mark Rafn

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: APSL 2.0: does "complete source code" exclude data? Aug 07
Re: {debian-legal} Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
relicensing dual-licensed works to single license. Aug 30

Mark Wielaard

Re: The GPL and you Aug 31

Martin Schulze

Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Aug 18
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 30

Mathieu Roy

Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 30
OFF-TOPIC Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Can the FSF be corrupted Aug 30
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: GFDL (Was Re: documentation eq software ?) Aug 30
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 31
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: (completely OFF-TOPIC) Aug 31
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 31
Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)? Aug 29
Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
[pretending to be Re: A possible GFDL compromise] OFF-TOPIC Aug 29
[was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: GPL licenses and the "any later version" phrase (was: Re: A possible GFDL compromise) Aug 30
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Can the FSF be corrupted Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 29

Matt Taggart

Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 30

Matthew Garrett

Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 08
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 09
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 05
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 17
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 31
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 23
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 31
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 10
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 26
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08

Matthew Palmer

Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: Lossless JPEG software, a patch without a license Aug 05
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: msession copyright Aug 03

Michael Schultheiss

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

MJ Ray

Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 15
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Debian logo DFSG-freeness Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 03
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 05
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)? Aug 30
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 12

The last update was on 06:02 GMT Tue May 28. There are 1420 messages. Page 2 of 3.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 2 of 3

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc