[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should our documentation be free?

On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On 22 Aug 2003 12:04:55 GMT, Andreas Metzler <ametzler@logic.univie.ac.at> said: 
>> Actually we don't necessarily need that much, separating "100%
>> documenation" and "everything else" should be good enough, and we
>> can apply DFSG to the latter category (including "100% software" and
>> "partially software").
> 	I see. Your contention is that we should treat 100% software,
>  99%software+1%documentation, 98%software+2%documentation,
>  ... 2%software+98%documentation, 1%software+999%documentation --
>  somehow differently from 100%documentation?

No. I have not offered any opinion whether differing between
"software" and "non-software" in Debian is a sensible course of action
at all.

I was merely pointing out the fact that instead of splitting in

documentation | greyzone | software

the separation in

documentation | rest

is easier (just two classes) and might be good enough.
                cu andreas

Reply to: