[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 02:50:09 -0400 (EDT)
Walter Landry <wlandry@ucsd.edu> wrote:
> It would be fair to say that Debian has decided that the GFDL is not
> free according to the DFSG.  This opinion has only been getting
> stronger and more unified over time.  However, there is a significant
> minority who believe that documentation should be judged by a
> different standard than the DFSG.  They have yet to enumerate what
> those differences would be, though.

Please don't be so quick about saying that. Lots of people said things
like "there is a significant minority ..." or even "the majority of ..."
when it came to saying the GFDL was fully Free. That was obviously
debunked (and quite soundly as well, I might add). Let's not make that
mistake again eh? :)

Attachment: pgpJA6TlpT9A3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: