On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 10:07:20AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > Before I reply, I should add I still see it as wrong and misleading to apply > *software* guidelines to *documentation*, which to me are fundamentally > different beasts. Thus, I see the question as rather misleading. Which question? If you mean the subject line, please keep in mind that I was simply trying to make a very brief summary of a complex issue. > However, with the question narrowly framed as it is, regarding applying > the DFSG to the GFDL, I would concur as listed below. It was precisely my point to frame the quesstion narrowly. We've meta-discussed issues for literally years. I want a summary of (what should be) informed opinions on *this particular point* that can be presented to the rest of the Debian developers. [snip] > If you hold this opinion, be aware that this would only work if that > permission is not specific to Debian. Of course. -- G. Branden Robinson | As people do better, they start Debian GNU/Linux | voting like Republicans -- unless branden@debian.org | they have too much education and http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | vote Democratic. -- Karl Rove
Attachment:
pgpRYip2HiuuG.pgp
Description: PGP signature