On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 07:51:56PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Because this isn't the forum for discussing the removal of non-free? And > because the discussion about removing non-free has to wait until the > shelved[0] amendment about changing founding documents, which was/is > waiting for the now-completed voting amendment? Manoj's amendment wasn't just about "changing founding documents"; it introduced the concept, which you won't find in the current version of the Constitution (or any previous draft). From a Constitutional perspective, the Social Contract and DFSG are no different than any other nontechnical document the Project might issue under 4.1.5 and in fact are specifically the things Ian Jackson had in mind when he wrote that clause of the Constitution. However, we're getting off-topic for -legal and more into -project territory. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | kernel panic -- causal failure branden@debian.org | universe will now reboot http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgpP4sb7F6WOJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature