[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 07:50:32PM +0900, Fedor Zuev wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> AD>So, it appears that if I have a non word-readable home directory,
> AD>especially if it happens to be over crypto-loopback, I can't
> AD>store FDL documents in $HOME.
> 	False, btw.
> 	According FDL, "You may not use technical measures to
> obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the _copies_
> _you_ _make_ _or_ _distribute_". You has no obligations regarding
> you own copy of document. You only cannot distribute document and
> limit access to it in the same time.

I suggest you review the difference between the meanings of "and" and

G. Branden Robinson                |       Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux                   |       I met a man who wasn't there.
branden@debian.org                 |       He wasn't there again today,
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |       I think he's from the CIA.

Attachment: pgpgmZ5WzDqRG.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: