[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 17:24, Sergey V. Spiridonov wrote:

> Why clearly non-free things are in Debian? Is it because of Social 
> Contract? Why moving FDL becomes more important, than removing non-free?

Because this isn't the forum for discussing the removal of non-free? And
because the discussion about removing non-free has to wait until the
shelved[0] amendment about changing founding documents, which was/is
waiting for the now-completed voting amendment?

And, BTW, non-free isn't part of Debian.

[0] Thanks for the term, Branden!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: