[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy



On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:44:57PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> > My next post to -devel-announce will discuss some of these finer details.
> > In short, some members of the FSF have asked for us to give them some
> > more time to come up with a GFDL that's DFSG-free before we go all
> > gung-ho about putting it in non-free and having bigger controversies.
> > Martin (wearing his DPL hat) talked to me about this at debcamp.
> 
> Well, that's news!

News to me as well; I was *at* DebCamp and DebConf.

The issue of the GNU FDL even came up during one of the presentations;
Jonas Oberg of FSF Europe was asked about it point blank.

Well, I guess if the DPL and RM have made up their minds, there's no
point in anyone else being involved, eh?

Your transparent government at work!  :)

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    I must confess to being surprised
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    by the magnitude of incompatibility
branden@debian.org                 |    with such a minor version bump.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Manoj Srivastava

Attachment: pgpcv1Y3olyBl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: