On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 12:44:57PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote: > Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > > > My next post to -devel-announce will discuss some of these finer details. > > In short, some members of the FSF have asked for us to give them some > > more time to come up with a GFDL that's DFSG-free before we go all > > gung-ho about putting it in non-free and having bigger controversies. > > Martin (wearing his DPL hat) talked to me about this at debcamp. > > Well, that's news! News to me as well; I was *at* DebCamp and DebConf. The issue of the GNU FDL even came up during one of the presentations; Jonas Oberg of FSF Europe was asked about it point blank. Well, I guess if the DPL and RM have made up their minds, there's no point in anyone else being involved, eh? Your transparent government at work! :) -- G. Branden Robinson | I must confess to being surprised Debian GNU/Linux | by the magnitude of incompatibility branden@debian.org | with such a minor version bump. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Manoj Srivastava
Attachment:
pgpWpObjDDKQc.pgp
Description: PGP signature