[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise



On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:50:09AM -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
> It would be fair to say that Debian has decided that the GFDL is not
> free according to the DFSG.  This opinion has only been getting
> stronger and more unified over time.  However, there is a significant
> minority who believe that documentation should be judged by a
> different standard than the DFSG.

What's your threshold of statistical significance?  I'd like to know for
the purposes of commentary on my "final" survey reponse summary, which I
can produce about 12 hours from now if I'm still awake.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     You could wire up a dead rat to a
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     DIMM socket and the PC BIOS memory
branden@debian.org                 |     test would pass it just fine.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |     -- Ethan Benson

Attachment: pgpXoAKX006rS.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: