Re: A possible GFDL compromise
MJ Ray <email@example.com> writes:
> On 2003-08-28 01:28:54 +0100 Branden Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > "Enjoy" is not a term I would use to describe the process of
> > experiencing, say, Derrida's _Limited Inc._, but if that work were
> > freely licensed, I would certainly be able to access, read, and
> > otherwise "use" it.
> The trouble is to exclude "use" in the "fair use" sense of copying it
> for republication. "Enjoy" seemed a good word, as in "right to quiet
> enjoyment" that is a fairly unrelated legal phrase. Probably there's
> a better one.
Indeed, I started with "documentation" and switched to "text" as more
general; it's hard to keep the sentence structure so close using the
word "work." "Content" sounds good, so far.