[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible GFDL compromise

MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk> writes:

> On 2003-08-28 01:28:54 +0100 Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > "Enjoy" is not a term I would use to describe the process of
> > experiencing, say, Derrida's _Limited Inc._, but if that work were
> > freely licensed, I would certainly be able to access, read, and
> > otherwise "use" it.
> The trouble is to exclude "use" in the "fair use" sense of copying it
> for republication.  "Enjoy" seemed a good word, as in "right to quiet
> enjoyment" that is a fairly unrelated legal phrase.  Probably there's
> a better one.

Indeed, I started with "documentation" and switched to "text" as more
general; it's hard to keep the sentence structure so close using the
word "work."  "Content" sounds good, so far.


Reply to: