Re: Advice on DFSG status of this licence
Andrew Pollock <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I'm considering packaging up RIPE's whois server, and the closest thing I
> can find to a licence in the source tarball is the contents of the COPYING
> file, at the end of this message.
> The only bit I'm unsure of is the last sentence. Does it mean we can't
> refer to it as the "RIPE whois server"?
This looks like a rewritten MIT/X11 license. Unfortunately, there's
no grant of permission to distribute modified versions -- usually not
necessary, but some copyright holders have decided to be silly and
read "permission to modify and distribute" as different from
"permission to distribute modifications," most noticeably UW.
The last sentence just means that "Install Debian GNU/Hurd, with the
RIPE Whois Server!" shouldn't show up on our posters. It's verging on
non-free, violating DFSG 9, but this minor effect has been tolerated
for authors paranoid of exploitation before.
> Copyright (c) 1999 RIPE NCC
> All Rights Reserved
> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
> documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted,
> provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
> both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
> supporting documentation, and that the name of the author not be
> used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the
> software without specific, written prior permission.
> THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE,
> ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS; IN NO EVENT SHALL
> AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY
> DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN
> AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
> OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.