Re: A possible GFDL compromise
* Branden Robinson (firstname.lastname@example.org) [030828 20:35]:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 02:50:09AM -0400, Walter Landry wrote:
> > It would be fair to say that Debian has decided that the GFDL is not
> > free according to the DFSG. This opinion has only been getting
> > stronger and more unified over time. However, there is a significant
> > minority who believe that documentation should be judged by a
> > different standard than the DFSG.
> What's your threshold of statistical significance? I'd like to know for
> the purposes of commentary on my "final" survey reponse summary, which I
> can produce about 12 hours from now if I'm still awake.
5% (means: the conclusion is to at least 95% true, and to less than 5%
false) to make a "probably", 1% to settle it.
In reality I often accept also a 2:1 majority.
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C