debian-legal Aug 2003 by author

[previous page]

Page 3 of 3

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

MJ Ray

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Interpreting data, was: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 30
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 31
Re: Re: Decision GFDL Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: Can the FSF be corrupted Aug 30
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 14
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 30
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 22
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 14
Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: debian-legal needs a FAQ (was: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem) Aug 19
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: My understanding of the GFDL issue Aug 30
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: [pretending to be Re: A possible GFDL compromise] OFF-TOPIC Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 11
Re: license clarification for IRRToolSet Aug 26
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12

Nathanael Nerode

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 08
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 31
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 28
Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 12
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO? Aug 07
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 29
Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 12
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 03
Re: Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 25
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: DFSG intent question Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 04
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 12
Re: Should our documentation be free? Aug 12
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: License oddity in Securing Debian Manual Aug 28
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 03
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07

Neil McGovern

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: FFII-online-protest against patents Aug 20

Nicholas Clark

perl modules' default licence Aug 02
Re: perl modules' default licence Aug 06

Nick Phillips

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 13
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 03
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 13
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 10
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 10
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13

Oohara Yuuma

license for newbiedoc Aug 18

Paul C. Bryan

Patents, gimp-nonfree and LAME Aug 22

paul cannon

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
GPL licenses and the "any later version" phrase (was: Re: A possible GFDL compromise) Aug 30

Peter Makholm

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Peter S Galbraith

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Bug#202723: perl-doc: Non-free manpage included Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 30
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Can the FSF be corrupted Aug 30
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20

Petrisor Marian

RE: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13

Pierre THIERRY

Is the Apache Software License DFSG-compliant? Aug 08

Raghavendra Bhat

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22

Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Richard Braakman

Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Legal status of software licences Aug 25
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 18
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 30
Re: GNU FDL makes "difference files" useless Aug 28
Re: Re: Decision GFDL Aug 28
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 04
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 18
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 30
Re: MBSOPPRAPP02 found VIRUS= I-Worm.Sobig.f.txt (Kaspersky) virus Aug 29
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 01
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 28
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 29

Richard Stallman

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sep 01
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Sep 01
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25

Rick Moen

Licence oddity in Securing Debian Manual (was: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL) Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: The GPL and you Aug 31
Re: The GPL and you Sep 01
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 31
Re: License oddity in Securing Debian Manual Aug 29
Re: The GPL and you Aug 31
Re: Licence oddity in Securing Debian Manual Aug 29
Re: relicensing dual-licensed works to single license. Aug 29
Re: Licence oddity in Securing Debian Manual (was: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL) Aug 29
Re: The GPL and you Aug 31
Re: GPL licenses and the "any later version" phrase (was: Re: A possible GFDL compromise) Aug 30
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29

Rob Weir

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22

Robert McQueen

Bug#205152: mldonkey-server: contains obviously illegal non-free code Aug 13

Romain FRANCOISE

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Ronald S. Brakke

Virus Found in message "Approved" Aug 27
Virus Found in message "That movie" Aug 27

Russ Allbery

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 30

Sam Hocevar

Re: libdvdcss Aug 12
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22

Scott James Remnant

Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
How to get around the GFDL (under UK law, at least) Aug 28
Re: How to get around the GFDL (under UK law, at least) Aug 29
GNU FDL makes "difference files" useless Aug 28
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: Is the Apache Software License DFSG-compliant? Aug 08
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in Aug 05
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24

Sebastien Bacher

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22

Sergey Spiridonov

Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 26
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13

Sergey V. Spiridonov

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 18
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 10
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 14
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 02
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 03
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 23
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 11
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 10
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 09
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 05
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14

Simon Law

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Stephane Bortzmeyer

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 11
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: Should our documentation be free? (Was Re: Inconsistencies in our approach) Aug 11
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 07

Stephen Ryan

Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 27
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: APSL 2.0 Aug 07
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Stephen Stafford

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Steve King

Lossless JPEG software, a patch without a license Aug 04

Steve Langasek

Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 06
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 26
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 26
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 31
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: Bug#181969: [mdadams@ece.uvic.ca: Re: JasPer licensing wrt Debian Linux] Aug 28
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 22
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: Bug#181493: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 27
Re: a minimal copyleft Aug 05
Re: Debian logo DFSG-freeness Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23
Re: Is the Nokia Open Source License DFSG compliant? Aug 31
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 08
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 23
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 13
Re: The GPL and you Aug 31
Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ? Aug 29
semi-OT: does SPI have cause of action against SCO? Aug 07
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 23

Sunnanvind Fenderson

Re: swirl infringement by electrostore.se Aug 29

Thanks

Your're Next! Aug 18

Thomas Bushnell, BSG

Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 29
Re: GNU FDL and Debian Aug 01
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 28
Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287) Aug 29
Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287) Aug 01
Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287) Aug 29
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 29
Re: OT: Documentation as a Program [Re: Inconsistencies in our approach] Aug 29

Thomas Hood

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21

Tore Anderson

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 03
License evaluation sought Aug 01
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 02
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 01
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 01
Re: License evaluation sought Aug 03

Walter Landry

Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 31
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 31
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 20
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 21
Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL Aug 29
Re: Decision GFDL Aug 28
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 28
Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy Aug 21
Re: My understanding of the GFDL issue Aug 30

webmaster . autoresponder

MHOA Aug 20

Wolfgang Fischer

Re: mozilla export restrictions Aug 07
mozilla export restrictions Aug 07

Wouter Vanden Hove

Decision GFDL Aug 26

Wouter Verhelst

Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 26
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 29
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 26
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: Legal status of software licences Aug 25
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: GNU FDL makes "difference files" useless Aug 28
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: [DISCUSSION] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24
Re: documentation eq software ? Aug 30
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 08
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
Re: Inconsistencies in our approach Aug 09
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 16
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free Aug 24
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 18
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 21
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 14
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 19
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 15
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 08
A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem Aug 07
Re: Freaky copyright laws [was: SUN RPC code is DFSG-free] Aug 27
Re: A possible GFDL compromise Aug 25
Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem Aug 12
Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 29
Re: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 24

Yven Johannes Leist

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license? Aug 25

The last update was on 06:02 GMT Tue May 28. There are 1420 messages. Page 3 of 3.

[previous month]

[previous page]

Page 3 of 3

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc