debian-policy Jul 1999 by subject

[First Page] <
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 2 >
[next page] 		[Last Page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
'Bad' typo in menu-policy /usr/share/doc (was Re: weekly policy summary) /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition, debate reopened /usr/share/doc: some new proposals /var/lib, /var/mail /var/spool/mail AND ~user/mail/incomingmail [3.0.0.0] Policy manual copyright notice. [Debian bugs information: logs for bug#33669] Architecture specification strings Bug#24067: Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it? Bug#33076: Amendments stuck in discussion phase Bug#37251: Bug#33076: Amendments stuck in discussion phase Bug#38902: Data section Re: Bug#39830: [PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks Bug#39830: PROPOSED]: get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks Bug#40180: packaging manual typo Re: Bug#40304: write problem Bug#40706: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc Bug#40706: /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition Bug#40706: [AMENDMENT 17/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition Bug#40706: AMENDMENT 17/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition Bug#40706: my two cents Bug#40706: Programs that need to access every doc in the system. Bug#40706: Reasons for not moving at all Bug#40706: Supporting users. Bug#40706: usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc Bug#40706: usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc - Why don't we modify debhelper, etc..? Re: Bug#40742: proftpd: needs to conflict only with old wu-ftpds Bug#40766: [PROPOSED] Rewrite of "Configuration files" section Bug#40766: PROPOSED] Rewrite of "Configuration files" section Bug#40766: Rewrite of "configuration files" section Bug#40767: [PROPOSED] wording cleanup w.r.t. conffile/configuration file Bug#40767: PROPOSED] wording cleanup w.r.t. conffile/configuration file Bug#40864: debian-policy: Section 5.8 refers to /usr/doc/package Bug#40934: PROPOSAL: changelog.html.gz sanitization Bug#41095: small suggestion for packaging-manual Bug#41113: Proposal: Naming Conventions for modules Bug#41121: [PROPOSED] Add VISUAL when checking for user's editor Bug#41121: PROPOSED] Add VISUAL when checking for user's editor Bug#41232: AMENDMENT 1999-07-23] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages Bug#41232: dpkg-dev: Required changes to dpkg source for Policy amendment in bug#41232 [PATCH] Bug#41269: Bad version of debian-policy uploaded Bug#41269: marked as done (Bad version of debian-policy uploaded) Bug#41547: [PROPOSAL] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc Bug#41547: PROPOSAL] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc Bug#41547: PROPOSAL] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc Bug#41729: [PROPOSAL] Modify dpkg-buildpackage to handle FHS move Bug#41729: PROPOSAL] Modify dpkg-buildpackage to handle FHS move Bug#41829: debian-policy: Documents stored in /usr/doc/debian-policy, should be /usr/share/doc/debian-policy Bug#41902: Test suite proposal Bug#42052: [PROPOSAL] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail Bug#42052: PROPOSAL] /var/mail and /var/spool/mail Bug#42236: [PROPOSAL] method for shlibs to work with libfoo.so Clarification: Eliminate nagging at installation time? Re: Confusion about Libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages Data section (#38902) Debian conflicts with FHS on /usr/include/{linux,asm} dpkg: update-alternatives madness How to handle combined README/changelog file? installless debs Is /etc/rc.boot/ obsolete or not? isetl license (was Re: isetl developments and updates) menu, translate, i18n menu, translation, etc Re: Menu-2.0, optimized menu tree, hints More FHS discussion (Was: Uploaded debhelper 2.0.09 (source all) to master) New 'Meta-Package' tag for the control file New (?) /usr/share/doc New LGPL and references in copyright files. Re: new policy revision non-us depends Old bugs package sectinos Re: package sections (2K packages problem) policy change to 3.0.0: not before release? (was: Re: when move /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc ? Processed: [AMENDMENT 17/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition Processed: argh! That's TWICE! Processed: Bug#24067: Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it? Processed: dpkg: update-alternatives madness Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.0.0.0 Processed: Fixed in NMU debian-policy 3.0.1.0 Processed: got two seconds Processed: Next step Processed: Old proposals and fixed bugs Processed: Re: Bug#40706: Reasons for not moving at all Processed: Re: Bug#40742: proftpd: needs to conflict only with old wu-ftpds Processed: Re: Processed: Bug#24067: Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it? Processed: Re: weekly policy summary Programs for non-free operating systems PROPOSAL: changelog.html.gz sanitization Proposal: Naming Conventions for modules Q about .html documentation query about /etc Removal of old policy proposals seconded Selecting packages from thousands Some comments on policy 3.0.0.0 proposal (1999-06-29) The last update was on 10:28 GMT Sat May 11. There are 523 messages. Page 1 of 2.
<<
[previous month] 		|<
[first page] 		<
[previous page] 		Page 1 of 2
 >
[next page] 		>|
[last page] 		>>
[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]
Mail converted by MHonArc