Re: /usr/share/doc (was Re: weekly policy summary)
Hi,
>>"Anthony" == Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes:
Anthony> FWIW, I don't think forcing all packages to have postinst's
Anthony> and prerm's for the rest of eternity to be a particularly
Anthony> good solution either.
You don't need it for the rest of eternity. We create the
postinst, prerm now, installing the symlink, Once the move is over,
we just have a script removing teh symlink. another release,
(potato+2), we stop bothering, since we would have handled the most
common case (and provide an upgrade script removing teh symlinks for
upgrades at that point).
Yes, this is a long period, but not forever.
Anthony> If not, is there any reason why we can't just deal with it that way
Anthony> instead of asking the Debian Technical Cabal to resolve the issue?
See if it flies, then.
Anthony> Cheers,
Anthony> aj, who's trying not to read that as "The DPL can still mandate *my*
Anthony> solution, thank god."
heh. I wish I was that influential with the DPL.
manoj
--
You can't underestimate the power of fear. Tricia Nixon
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: