Re: PROPOSAL: changelog.html.gz sanitization
Hi,
>>"Joey" == Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> writes:
>> > If the upstream changelog file is HTML formatted, it must be
must?
>> > accessible as `/usr/doc/<package>/changelog.html.gz'. A plain
>> > text version of the changelog must be accessible as
>> > `/usr/doc/<package>/changelog.gz' (this can be created by
>> > `lynx -dump -nolist').
Why are both mandated? Why can't we just have
/usr/doc/<package>/changelog.gz, however it was created? I havr no
objections if the html stuff is there too, but what is the rationale
for haing both the text and the html *mandated* by policy?
manoj
--
The fourth law of thermodynamics: The perversity of the universe
tends towards a maximum.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: