Re: /usr/share/doc (was Re: weekly policy summary)
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
> >>"Chris" == Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net> writes:
> Chris> It may be too late. We *NEED* consensus on this sort of thing:
> No, we do not need a consensus. The DPL can still mandate a
> solution by fiat, thank god.
Man, your reading comprehension skills have gone to pot since you
decided that this was all something to be furious about. I much
prefer calm, reasoned debate. Especially when discussing technical
issues. I hope we can both get on the same page one of these days,
because I'm really tired of being misinterpreted and attacked for
things I didn't say.
I certainly hope the DPL has more sense that to listen to someone on
the edge of hysteria about an issue.
> Chris> Wonko is compliant with policy version 3.0.0.0; the
[...]
> Until the policy document come out (and it may be years before
> that happens, the package is indeed in violation of policy.
Bzzt, thanks for playing. 3.0.0.0 is policy today.
--
Chris Waters xtifr@dsp.net | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or xtifr@debian.org | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
Reply to: