Re: Debian conflicts with FHS on /usr/include/{linux,asm}
Hi,
>>"Ben" == Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org> writes:
>>>>> "Manoj" == Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
Brian> Yes, the headers under /usr/include should match the
Brian> current kernel version installed(using package managment of
Brian> course).
Manoj> What do you mean by version? I have 6 kernel images
Manoj> installed, and 3 kernel source pacakges. Which version is
Manoj> the one that should be in there? What happens when I reboot
Manoj> into a different version? What happens when I get a new
Manoj> kernel source package?
Ben> For Joe Average User, I believe the latest kernel version
Ben> installed
Latest version of what? The sources? Or the kernel-header
package? or what? And what does it have to do with the kernel-image
they happen to be running? Of the kernel-image they are going to be
running tomorrow? What purpose does the test serve anyway? If it is
that closely related to the kernel version running, then it should
fail miserably when one upgrades the kernel. Is that the case?
Ben> should be where /usr/include/linux and asm refer to. This makes the
Ben> least amount of pain, as most users do not have multiple kernels they
Ben> switch between.
I think you are wrong. Most people do keep at least two kernel
images -- one for backup, in case the new image failes.
Unless these technical issues are addressed (the best way is
for the config script for the software to ask for the location of the
kernel headers for the kernel that the software is being targetted
for, if indeed this tight a coupling is required, and then build),
the software is broken. I do not want to break Debian to pander to
broken software.
manoj
--
A good USENET motto would be: "Together, a strong community."
"Computers R Us." "I'm sick of programming, I think I'll just screw
around for a while on company time." A Sane Man
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Reply to: