[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /usr/share/doc (was Re: weekly policy summary)



Hi,
>>"Chris" == Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net> writes:

 Chris> Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:
 >> >>"Chris" == Chris Waters <xtifr@dsp.net> writes:

 Chris> It may be too late.  We *NEED* consensus on this sort of thing:

 >> No, we do not need a consensus. The DPL can still mandate a
 >> solution by fiat, thank god. 

 Chris> Man, your reading comprehension skills have gone to pot since you
 Chris> decided that this was all something to be furious about.  I

        I can say much the same. Read on. 

 Chris> much prefer calm, reasoned debate.  Especially when discussing
 Chris> technical issues.  I hope we can both get on the same page one
 Chris> of these days, because I'm really tired of being
 Chris> misinterpreted and attacked for things I didn't say.

 Chris> I certainly hope the DPL has more sense that to listen to someone on
 Chris> the edge of hysteria about an issue.

        Calm, reasoned, debate. I see. 



 Chris> Wonko is compliant with policy version 3.0.0.0; the
 Chris> [...]
 >> Until the policy document come out (and it may be years before
 >> that happens, the package is indeed in violation of policy. 

 Chris> Bzzt, thanks for playing.  3.0.0.0 is policy today.


        You really can't follow logic, eh? Here, in words closer to
 one syllable: your example:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

- - - -

  To: Alan S. Shole <asshole@debian.org>
  Subject: Bug#66666: wonko uses /usr/share/doc only
  Reply-to: 66666@bugs.debian.org, Joe User <joe@user.com>

  Package: wonko
  Version: 4.04-3

  Wonko uses /usr/share/doc and doesn't have a symlink in /usr/doc,
  which is a violation of policy.

- - - -

  To: 66666-done@bugs.debian.org, Joe User <joe@user.com>
  Subject: Re: Bug#66666: wonko uses /usr/share/doc only

  Wonko is compliant with policy version 3.0.0.0; the requirement for
  a symlink did not appear until 3.0.0.1.  This is not a bug.  The
  requirement for a symlink is guaranteed (by policy) to be revoked in
  a future version of policy, and Wonko will stick with 3.0.0.0 until then.

  I see no reason to waste my time creating this symlink only to
  remove it again later.  When policy 4.x comes out, I may be able to
  change the standards version without changing anything else.

- - - -
----------------------------------------------------------------------

        Until the (quote: ``future version of policy'' comes out, the
 package in questin (wonko, unless you have forgotten), is in
 violation of the current policy version, (which, in this example,
 happens to be  3.0.0.1). Saying you are sticking to an older policy
 version is not an option.

        manoj
-- 
 "You'll pay to know what you really think." J.R. "Bob" Dobbs
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E


Reply to: