[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /var/lib, /var/mail



On Sun, Jul 25, 1999 at 05:32:42PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I see that the policy manual has been changed (s3.1) to require FHS
> compliance rather than FSSTND compliance.
> 
> I'd like to make two proposals:
> 
> * That we make an exception for /var/state.  Ie, we mandate that
> packages us /var/lib.  This change has no purpose and will only be
> hassle for us.

Not necessary.  FHS 2.1 due out RSN (Dan reads this list I believe)
renames /var/state back to /var/lib...  Reason being that it'd be a PITA
for most non-trivial programs to reliably have things moved around like
that.  /var/lib keeps the /var/state layout which is cleaner than /var/lib
under the FSSTND.


> * That we make an exception for /var/mail.  Same as before, but last I
> heard there were rumours that FHS were going to abandon /var/mail.
> When I was last at an LSB meeting all the other distributions wanted
> /var/spool/mail back.

FHS has abandoned /var/lib but not /var/mail in 2.1.  It looked like they
were going to abandon it, but they then decided to simply say that it
could be a symlink to some other place if necessary.  My suggestion is
that we do not move /var/spool/mail on existing systems and instead simply
create a symlink from /var/mail and call it good.  /var/mail should be the
directory on a new system, though the compatibility symlink should be
created (not maintained by any package)

This allows the move to /var/mail to happen without seriously hindering
backward compatibility and allows us to continue to use software which
doesn't use /var/mail as long as we like.  It also doesn't interfere with
the element of least surprise for a sysadmin who has /var/spool/mail
mounted as a partition.

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>             Debian GNU/Linux developer
GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC  44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77  8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Silvrbear> Oxymorons?  I saw one yesterday - the pamphlet on "Taco Bell
            Nutritional Information"

Attachment: pgpKaao7hhp_r.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: