Re: Processed: Bug#24067: Is it ok to close a bug without fixing it?
reassign 24067 gawk
retitle 24067 changelog does not tell the truth
thanks
On 16 Jul 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why has this rejected old proposal been reopened, without an
> iota of explanation?
My message dated Fri, 16 Jul 1999 21:33:25 +0200 (CET), tried to explain this.
> Why is this a normal bug?
Because as a bug against gawk, it has not been fixed, so it should not be
marked as "fixed".
> Why is it not following the policy update guidelines?
Because I didn't know that every bug against debian-policy had to be a
"proposal". I'm doing the reassign now. I apologize for the inconvenience,
it is not my intention to bypass established procedures.
Thanks.
--
"c4b35361cf01a4b530f235b1a84eac5a" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: