[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#41232: debian-policy: [PROPOSAL] Build-time dependencies on binary packages



If I understand the proposal, I think I have a strong objection to
the names of the fields.

> 2) Summary
> 
> My proposal is, in short, the following: Define six new fields for
> debian/control and specify their meaning.  The six new fields are used
> only in .dsc files and in the first paragraph of debian/control.  They
> are:
[ Depends, Arch-Depends, Indep-Depends, Conflicts, Arch-Conflicts,
Indep-Conflicts]

I realize that these would be in the first stanza of the control
file, and therefore don't technically conflict with the binary
Depends/Conflicts fields, but I think it's going to lead to a lot
of confusion, particularly for new maintainers. Why not name them
Src-Depends, Src-Indep-Depends, etc.

Steve


Reply to: