Bug#40706: usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> With this we have the following four stages:
>
> [snipped]
For people not using helper tools (there are many of them), this means
*double* work for every package, because you have first to provide
symlinks and then you have to remove them.
I do not think it is reasonable.
The FHS migration will be painful enough so that we have to make it
twice. Better to do it at a time (on a per package basis), only *once*.
I would much prefer some sort of "light" release goal (i.e. not to be
interpreted very strictly). For example: "We will try to make all base and
priority >= standard packages in potato to use /usr/share/doc instead of
/usr/doc".
--
"7119841ee3dabf13c3e35e053f7e6f09" (a truly random sig)
Reply to: