[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#40706: AMENDMENT 17/7/99] /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc transition



On Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 03:13:55AM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >         For multi binary packages I tend to have separate installation
> >  script for each binary package. Is that not the case generally? (I
> >  also tend to have the package name in a lot of maintainer scripts, as
> >  well as the version, but that does not seem to be the norm).
> 
> I do not know.  I thought the xserver-* scripts were like that (a
> common script for many packages), but they seem to have the package
> name in each script.

They're one script in the source package.  Some sed magic is used to make
individual versions for each binary package at build time.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson              |   Religion is something left over from the
Debian GNU/Linux                 |   infancy of our intelligence; it will
branden@ecn.purdue.edu           |   fade away as we adopt reason and science
cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |   as our guidelines.  -- Bertrand Russell

Attachment: pgp0s2zuQ_eQC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: