Re: Bug#41547: PROPOSAL] Correct section 3.3 to take account of file-rc
[Cc'd to -policy for comments.]
> > > So I (as the actual maintainer of file-rc) second your proposal, to
> > > change the policy in a way, that forbids to create the symlinks in a
> > > way different to update-rc.d.
> >
> > Should I undertake to propose a revised wording or would you like to?
>
> You started this proposal, so why don't you simply bring it to a good
> end? I'll support your intension...
So I'd like some advice. The whole policy about /etc/rc?.d fails
immediately when file-rc is being used. So should I actually propose
a rewriting which talks only about runlevels and starting/stopping
services at various runlevels which has no dependency on the
/etc/rc?.d directories? I think that is the correct way forward.
Julian
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. J.D.Gilbey@qmw.ac.uk
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Reply to: