Re: A possible GFDL compromise
On 2003-08-22 16:14:31 +0100 John Goerzen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
What do people here think about that, and is there any indication if
would be amenable to this change?
I haven't seen anything to make me think that they would be, but ICBW.
It seems to strike at one of their reasons for having unremovable
unfixable sections, which is to allow advertising (or, in other words,
writing on the relationship of the publisher to the work) and make the
licence more acceptable to old-fashioned publishers.
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.