Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?
From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 13:35:54 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 8cab439201f23e71986d2e6739445118@Bouncing>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m3u17zzdi0.fsf@wotan.nib>

On 2003-08-30 10:44:07 +0100 Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org> wrote:

As I said before, I think the GFDL provide the freedom that matters
for a documentation.

I agree with you for the documentation part, but I don't think itgives the freedom that matters for the whole work and that's needed.


--
MJR/slef   My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?
  - From: Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible GFDL compromise
Next by Date: Interpreting data, was: A possible GFDL compromise
Previous by thread: Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?
Next by thread: Re: Freedom to modify other literary work, was: [...GFDL...] documentation eq software ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread