Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 00:11:26 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] bhh1ed$1cc$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] E8B3F3A2-CE89-11D7-ADFA-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
References: <[🔎] bhedi3$qj3$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] E8B3F3A2-CE89-11D7-ADFA-00039317863E@suespammers.org>

Anthony DeRobertis wrote:

So, if those things were under strait GPL, by your usefulnessdefinition, they wouldn't be DFSG-free, because they don't grant thefreedom to create proprietary works?


My "usefulness definition" is not interpretation of DFSG.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Reply to:

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread