Re: Documentation and Sarge's Release Critical Policy
Adam Warner <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> [message BCCed to aj]
> I wanted you all to be aware how Sarge is treating Documentation and the
> DFSG: <http://people.debian.org/~ajt/sarge_rc_policy.txt>
> Documentation in main and contrib must be freely distributable,
> and wherever possible should be under a DFSG-free license. This
> will likely become a requirement post-sarge.
Why can't the offending packages just be moved to non-free? It isn't
like there hasn't been enough warning.
> Given the aggressive (and endearingly optimistic) timetable of releasing
> Sarge this December[0!] I support this pragmatic decision.
Pragmatism is not the defining principle of the DFSG.