Re: APSL 2.0

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: APSL 2.0
From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2003 14:22:40 -0000
Message-id: <[🔎] slrnbj4o5g.5sa.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet>
References: <[🔎] slrnbj4bpl.2d9.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <[🔎] hhsmod3n2w.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <[🔎] hhsmod3n2w.fsf@theorie.physik.uni-muenchen.de> <[🔎] 1060249133.1386.51.camel@work.consulting.net.nz> <[🔎] slrnbj4bpl.2d9.markj+0111@bouncing.localnet> <[🔎] 1060306640.1193.40.camel@mozart>

Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> the whole installation was under such a license.  I'm now liable to
> distribute the source code for an entire operating system to every
> person who manages to obtain a web page from me.

How does this differ from your current obligation to either provide
the source or equivalent offer to that which you obtained the source?
Or is your server a 0-user affair?  So why wouldn't the offer clause
work for you?

-- 
MJR/slef   My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu>

References:
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
- APSL 2.0
  - From: Jens Schmalzing <jens.schmalzing@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: Adam Warner <lists@consulting.net.nz>
- Re: APSL 2.0
  - From: Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: APSL 2.0
Next by Date: Re: mozilla export restrictions
Previous by thread: Re: APSL 2.0
Next by thread: Re: APSL 2.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread