Op do 28-08-2003, om 21:14 schreef Walter Landry: > Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote: > > As for GPL 3, do you intend to use clauses similar to invariant sections > > or to the technical measures stuff in GFDL section 2? This is a matter > > of concern on this list. > > > > That surprises me, since I believe I sent a message to this list > > answering that precise question, two or three months ago. > > > > I cannot find that message easily--the only way I can search my large > > volume of mail is with grep. If a substantial number of people are > > concerned, can one of them look up my previous message and repost it? > > Do you mean this? > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200306/msg00173.html For the sake of those who read their mail offline (of whom Richard is known to be one): ``[...] For GPL version 3 we are considering requirements for preserving certain limited author information in the source code, and making explicit that other GPL-compatible licenses that are present on parts of the code cannot be removed from the source, but nothing beyond that.'' -- Wouter Verhelst Debian GNU/Linux -- http://www.debian.org Nederlandstalige Linux-documentatie -- http://nl.linux.org "Stop breathing down my neck." "My breathing is merely a simulation." "So is my neck, stop it anyway!" -- Voyager's EMH versus the Prometheus' EMH, stardate 51462.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dit berichtdeel is digitaal ondertekend