*To*: debian-legal@lists.debian.org*Subject*: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem*From*: Sergey Spiridonov <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>*Date*: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:30:13 +0200*Message-id*: <[🔎] bhi975$htb$2@sea.gmane.org>*In-reply-to*: <[🔎] 20030814204638.GL13227@tennyson.netexpress.net>*References*: <[🔎] 1060732005.26001.33.camel@bohr> <[🔎] bhcp7l$rbf$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 8765l1k88v.fsf@wasp.nowan.org> <[🔎] bhe41a$8va$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1060809711.18923.211.camel@gargantubrain.dartmouth.edu> <[🔎] bhelik$7h4$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 948.1060832172@mixed> <[🔎] bhfakg$124$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1504.1060872594@mixed> <[🔎] bhgod0$j2v$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20030814204638.GL13227@tennyson.netexpress.net>

Steve Langasek wrote: > the point of it. The sacred cow in question is the *DFSG*, a set of > principles that form the basis for this list's decisions about what is > considered free enough for inclusion in Debian. Your notion that the

-- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>

**Then let's hear your proposal***From:*Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

**References**:**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Next by Date:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Previous by thread:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Next by thread:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Index(es):