Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
From: Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:19:09 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030818181909.GD1142@cs78143044.pp.htv.fi>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] A89D760C-CD05-11D7-976A-00039317863E@suespammers.org>
References: <[🔎] 20030811225907.GF8842@grep.be> <[🔎] A89D760C-CD05-11D7-976A-00039317863E@suespammers.org>

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:43:41PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Please understand that the readers of -legal have been subject to no 
> less than half a year (or are we at a year now...?) of GFDL 
> discussions,

Almost two years now.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00126.html

Richard Braakman

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

References:
- Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
  - From: Wouter Verhelst <wouter@grep.be>
- Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
  - From: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Next by Date: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread