Richard Braakman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:43:41PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:Please understand that the readers of -legal have been subject to no less than half a year (or are we at a year now...?) of GFDL discussions,Almost two years now. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200110/msg00126.html
If it was decided, why DFSG and SC were not changed? At least there should be a statement included in DFSG, saying
"Please, read debian-legal archive since 2001, before you think you understand what DFSG is about. DON'T RELY ON DICTIONARIES!".
-- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov