[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem

Richard Braakman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:43:41PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:

Please understand that the readers of -legal have been subject to no less than half a year (or are we at a year now...?) of GFDL discussions,

Almost two years now.


If it was decided, why DFSG and SC were not changed? At least there should be a statement included in DFSG, saying

"Please, read debian-legal archive since 2001, before you think you understand what DFSG is about. DON'T RELY ON DICTIONARIES!".

Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Reply to: