Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Richard Braakman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 04:43:41PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Please understand that the readers of -legal have been subject to no
less than half a year (or are we at a year now...?) of GFDL
Almost two years now.
If it was decided, why DFSG and SC were not changed? At least there
should be a statement included in DFSG, saying
"Please, read debian-legal archive since 2001, before you think you
understand what DFSG is about. DON'T RELY ON DICTIONARIES!".
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov