*To*: debian-legal@lists.debian.org*Subject*: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem*From*: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>*Date*: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:37:05 +0200*Message-id*: <[🔎] bhgod0$j2v$1@sea.gmane.org>*In-reply-to*: <[🔎] 1504.1060872594@mixed>*References*: <[🔎] bh6hmf$bdj$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20030812030417.GA1679@twcny.rr.com> <[🔎] bha14d$gvj$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1060682254.1132.8.camel@arrakis.ens-lyon.fr> <[🔎] bhbcoe$if$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1060715426.1142.56.camel@arrakis.ens-lyon.fr> <[🔎] bhbh1n$7ou$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1060732005.26001.33.camel@bohr> <[🔎] bhcp7l$rbf$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 8765l1k88v.fsf@wasp.nowan.org> <[🔎] bhe41a$8va$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1060809711.18923.211.camel@gargantubrain.dartmouth.edu> <[🔎] bhelik$7h4$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 948.1060832172@mixed> <[🔎] bhfakg$124$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1504.1060872594@mixed>

Peter S Galbraith wrote:

But this is _GPL'ed_ software which seems to be doing quite well without sacrificing its license for more market share. You can't possibly argue

Are are implying that I am against the GPL? If so, read what I said over again.

Are you implying that I am against the freedom? If so, read what I said over again. -- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>

**References**:**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Jeremy Hankins <nowan@nowan.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Next by Date:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Previous by thread:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Next by thread:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Index(es):