Re: APSL 2.0
Brian Kimball <bk@bk.cx> wrote:
> We should petition the FSF to go all the way and require a guarantee of
> full write access to the machines providing these services.
I think that you have broken normal logical extension in two emails about
this licence now. Why do you think that offering a fixed service version
yourself is not a viable option?
Reply to:
- References:
- APSL 2.0
- From: Jens Schmalzing <jens.schmalzing@physik.uni-muenchen.de>
- Re: APSL 2.0
- From: Adam Warner <lists@consulting.net.nz>
- Re: APSL 2.0
- From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
- Re: APSL 2.0
- From: Brian Kimball <bk@bk.cx>