[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?



On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 09:30, Branden Robinson wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:59:32PM +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
> > 
> > iD8DBQE/Ri+5Qxo87aLX0pIRAnk2AJ9MAKis4/wKYxZu3IkM/266z5ghLwCggh/9
> > vv/E4AchLIziqcb6Pesgo2U=
> > =o3Et
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> The key used to generate this signature has expired, so I am not
> counting you as a Debian Developer for the purposes of this survey.
> 
pub  1024D/A2D7D292 2002-06-08 Sebastien Bacher <sebastien.bacher@insa-lyon.fr>
uid                            Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
sub  2048g/48985276 2002-06-08 [expires: 2003-12-05]

Doesn't expire until the 5th of December ... perhaps he regularly
changes his expiry and --refresh-keys is in order?

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: