Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
From: MJ Ray <markj@cloaked.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:27:40 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] cded854159badfd3d8e0a5468b27210b@Bouncing>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] m31xv45xd6.fsf@dionysos.nib>

On 2003-08-29 15:53:09 +0100 Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org> wrote:

Because the DFSG is not DFSG compliant.

AFAICT, the DFSG is under the OPL with no options enabled and thatlicence is considered DFSG-free. Am I missing something?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
  - From: Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org>

References:
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
  - From: Mathieu Roy <yeupou@gnu.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [RESULTS] SURVEY: Is the GNU FDL a DFSG-free license?
Next by Date: Re: Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL
Previous by thread: Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
Next by thread: Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq software ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread