Re: Inconsistencies in our approach
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:25:27PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> To the extent that licenses should be considered software here, yes. I
> do, however, disagree with your characterization of this as a double
> But there is a bright line between requiring modifiability of a
> package contents, and requiring modifiability of a package's legal
> metadata. In contrast, documentation and programs are both package
> contents; no one has yet identified the bright line to use for
> demarcation of these two categories.
For the benefit of those who might otherwise assume that Steve is voicing
a lone opinion here:
Nick Phillips -- email@example.com
This will be a memorable month -- no matter how hard you try to forget it.