Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)
- To: bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen)
- Cc: "BSG)"@murphy.debian.org, Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>, 156287@bugs.debian.org, Robert Millan <zeratul2@wanadoo.es>, debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)
- From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
- Date: 31 Jul 2003 21:57:10 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k79yvuu1.fsf@becket.becket.net>
- In-reply-to: <m2ptjquwf5.fsf@the-orb.evenmere.org>
- References: <20030728233837.GA17172@aragorn> <20030729081953.GA10221@zoy.org> <20030729204707.GA23924@aragorn> <20030729222121.GE10221@zoy.org> <20030730010236.GB24365@aragorn> <20030729231452.GH3845@tennyson.netexpress.net> <20030730014948.GA24634@aragorn> <20030730010121.GA9552@quetzlcoatl.dodds.net> <87u1940zfd.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20030730165118.GE9683@tennyson.netexpress.net> <87k79yy26e.fsf@becket.becket.net> <874r12fokl.fsf@woodcarver.mitre.org> <871xw6xr6v.fsf@becket.becket.net> <m2ptjquwf5.fsf@the-orb.evenmere.org>
bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen) writes:
> Your interpretation would make the access-circumvention provision
> almost useless: it would mean it only mattered when preventing access
> to illegally copied works. Which, hey, is a reasonable law. Neat.
No, it would also mean that you can't make an access-circumvention for
a *copy protection* scheme. The point is that CSS isn't a
copyprotection scheme, not at all.
Reply to: