[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#156287: Advice on Drip (ITP #156287)



bts@alum.mit.edu (Brian T. Sniffen) writes:

> Your interpretation would make the access-circumvention provision
> almost useless: it would mean it only mattered when preventing access
> to illegally copied works.  Which, hey, is a reasonable law.  Neat.

No, it would also mean that you can't make an access-circumvention for
a *copy protection* scheme.  The point is that CSS isn't a
copyprotection scheme, not at all.



Reply to: