Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:23:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] bha14d$gvj$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030812030417.GA1679@twcny.rr.com>
References: <[🔎] bh6hmf$bdj$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20030812030417.GA1679@twcny.rr.com>

Nathanael Nerode wrote:

Please give one reason for allowing this other than "I want to allowManual(s) X, Y, and Z in Debian". Any one reason.


FDL is free enough.
--
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>

References:
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>
- Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
  - From: neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)

Prev by Date: Re: DFSG intent question
Next by Date: Re: A possible approach in 'solving' the FDL problem
Previous by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Next by thread: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread