On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 06:09, Branden Robinson wrote:
Part 1. DFSG-freeness of the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2
Please mark with an "X" the item that most closely approximates your
opinion. Mark only one.
[ X ] The GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.2, as published
by the Free Software Foundation, is not a license compatible
with the Debian Free Software Guidelines. Works under this
license would require significant additional permission
statements from the copyright holder(s) for a work under this
license to be considered Free Software and thus eligible for
inclusion in the Debian OS.
[ ] The GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.2, as published
by the Free Software Foundation, is a license compatible
with the Debian Free Software Guidelines. In general, works
under this license would require no additional permission
statements from the copyright holder(s) for a work under this
license to be considered Free Software and thus eligible for
inclusion in the Debian OS.
[ ] The GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.2, as published
by the Free Software Foundation, can be a license compatible
with the Debian Free Software Guidelines, but only if certain
restrictions stated in the license are not exercised by the
copyright holder with respect to a given work. Works under
this license will have to be scrutinized on a case-by-case
basis for us to determine whether the work can be be considered
Free Software and thus eligible for inclusion in the Debian OS.
[ ] None of the above statements approximates my opinion.
Part 2. Status of Respondent
Please mark with an "X" the following item only if it is true.
[ X ] I am a Debian Developer as described in the Debian
Constitution as of the date on this survey.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part