Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem
Bernhard R. Link wrote:
* Sergey Spiridonov <firstname.lastname@example.org> [030813 13:36]:
It's interesting that people who want Debian to move FDL to non-free at
the same time want Debian to distribute non-free stuff.
Is it accidental?
I think that is at most half true. The other direction is definitly true:
What is half-true? Non-free is not distributed by Debian?
People wanting FDL in main want to distribute non-free stuff.
Hm... Can you prove it? Software in non-free is clearly non-free. While
FDL seems to be disputable on this list.
(And this even wrongly labeled and as part of Debian, in contrary
to those who want to support non-free stuff in general and
FDL-manuals in special to help our users until there are proper
So distributing non-free is a good thing? Do you really think, that you
help users when you distribute non-free?
Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov