*To*: debian-legal@lists.debian.org*Subject*: Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem*From*: "Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>*Date*: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 21:57:01 +0200*Message-id*: <[🔎] bhe56d$b10$1@sea.gmane.org>*In-reply-to*: <[🔎] 20030813142715.A10000@ganymed.informatik.uni-freiburg.de>*References*: <[🔎] bh6hmf$bdj$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20030812030417.GA1679@twcny.rr.com> <[🔎] bha14d$gvj$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 1060682254.1132.8.camel@arrakis.ens-lyon.fr> <[🔎] bhbcoe$if$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 2001.1060740173@mixed> <[🔎] bhd7ao$g3g$1@sea.gmane.org> <[🔎] 20030813142715.A10000@ganymed.informatik.uni-freiburg.de>

Bernhard R. Link wrote:

* Sergey Spiridonov <sena@hurd.homeunix.org> [030813 13:36]:It's interesting that people who want Debian to move FDL to non-free atthe same time want Debian to distribute non-free stuff.Is it accidental?I think that is at most half true. The other direction is definitly true:

What is half-true? Non-free is not distributed by Debian?

People wanting FDL in main want to distribute non-free stuff.

(And this even wrongly labeled and as part of Debian, in contraryto those who want to support non-free stuff in general andFDL-manuals in special to help our users until there are proper replacements.)

-- Best regards, Sergey Spiridonov

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Joe Wreschnig <piman@debian.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>

**References**:**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*neroden@twcny.rr.com (Nathanael Nerode)

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Josselin Mouette <josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Sergey V. Spiridonov" <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*Sergey Spiridonov <sena@hurd.homeunix.org>

**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem***From:*"Bernhard R. Link" <blink@informatik.uni-freiburg.de>

- Prev by Date:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Next by Date:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Previous by thread:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Next by thread:
**Re: A possible approach in "solving" the FDL problem** - Index(es):